The Downfall of Society

This is a lengthy read, however it has information which could save your life.












Upon close evaluation of the facts it has come to my attention that what is the cause of our lack of progress as a society. This key factor is often overlooked by many members of communities all across the globe. If we focus in on this one source of destruction and ignore the fact that for the most part we are governed by the controlling dominance of “the Man” as it used to be called, which forces upon us to congeal into the collective. This collective mentality exists even among the people thinking they are breaking out of it, when they are never really free from the grip. Since they themselves are just one of many cogs the collective has everywhere. No, the real destruction will come long before the collective do major damage. This problem arises from none other than the existence and use of doors.
Think for a moment, ours and many other cultures use doors every day unconsciously unaware of the danger that lurks within their solid frames. Have you ever stopped to think about how many doors you use every day, or the impact this has on yourself or the society you are a part of? Well think about this situation which will demonstrate the severity of the problem. Imagine you are walking down the street going to get your hair cut when all of a sudden you realize nature is calling, you have to use the facilities, the restroom, number 2 and immediately. Luckily you are near a store such as Wal-Mart, or other such location. You walk up to the store and what so happens to be preventing you from your new destination but a door, the first of many you will encounter in your endeavor. No sooner do you pass through the first obstacle than you are faced with yet another door to overcome after leaving the outside world behind. To get to the inner sanctum of this building where the throne of porcelain awaits you must traverse this second door to make it onto the main sales floor and the next stage of the journey. Upon your arrival you traverse the isles avoiding the employees and their apparent gesture of goodwill and special discounts and reach the designated areas for the restroom. You are faced with another challenge brought on by doors, you must pass through one door to reach the goal, however two doors stand in your way, each designated with a symbol of proper authority of entering yet they both hold fast to their door brethren in challenging the establishment. Upon completing this challenge depending on which store you have entered not but 2 feet in front of you are faced with another one challenging you. In a rush you barge on through expecting you are home free as you can smell the aftermath that is a public room of this service. When you turn the corner and faced with numerous sets of doors all blocking the passage to the seat of power. Thus it took you 5 doors to reach your detoured destination and it will take an extra 5 to get back on task to you original goal. Of course when reaching the final destination there will doubtless be between one to three more doors to overcome. For such a simple task as getting your hair cut when nature calls you must pass through 11 to 13 doors if not more seeing as this situation started you on the street, no telling how many doors you encountered earlier in the day, or afterwards for that matter.

You may be saying to yourself “No big deal I go through doors with no problems” however that is the real danger. Not many people realize there is a threat until it will be too late. The easiest consequence of the door’s hold over us is the time which is spent on the usage of doors when the actual use of the door isn’t your specified goal. I’m willing to guess the amount of time and brain usage about doors over the course of an average person’s life exceeds one possibly two or more years. Being conservative with these calculations we will assume 1 year for the average lifetime. Given there are over 6 billion people in the world it is save to assume at least half of the population uses doors on a regular basis. Thus just within this generation of people living we are missing out on roughly 3 billion person years worth of enriching society. This calculation doesn’t even include all of the years in which previous generations have wasted ever since the door first door was created. Given that previous generations had less people to use doors and less doors to be used I would argue we have mist out on more person years of society progressive behavior than the number of years it is assumed the Earth has been in existence, if not at least more than humans have been around. With all of this time spent using doors we could have been living on mars, or in space but instead we are at the state of current existence.

You may be saying such things can’t be correct as not all doors are created equal. Although this statement is true it doesn’t hinder but rather expedites the argument. These days we have pull doors, push doors, automatic doors, revolving doors, doors that open from the left, right, or from the middle, doors which open upwards or downwards, and doors made from a wide variety of materials from rock, wood, metal of various types, and even paper doors. With such an extensive list of types consider how much time was spent developing designs and testing all the doors. Not to mention the building of the millions of doors in use today.
If the only evil doors were capable of was wasting productive time then the door wouldn’t be the ultimate evil to society it would be more of a nuisance. There is however a darker side to this matter doors are capable of inflicting physical and mental harm on society as a whole. Physical damages are easily shown with such examples as premature door closings. This condition can result in many injuries ranging from bruises, scratches all the way up to broken bones, separation of body parts, as well as death. Death is a pretty permanent state of being thus far in human evolution therefore it is a drastic consequence of society using such a dangerous tool. What if let us say the next person who dies from this dreadful condition is the scientist who just thought of the way to make death less permanent. This would be ironic, however it might have already happened countless times as death stands at a permanent state of being, and doors continue to claim countless lives.

The psychological problems caused by doors is less well known however just as dangerous if not more so to society as the previously listed problems. Stress and depression can be induced in people who aren’t aware of the scheme that doors are up to. For instance if a person is repeatedly having doors closed in their face they start feeling unwanted. This has been shown to be the case even with such incidents as an automatic door which closes, or fails to open immediately as a person approaches it. Many of these people go into a deep form of depression as of yet has no cure since most professional physicians have yet to acknowledge the door is the true cause. There is also a flip side to this condition causing people to have inflated egos, and feeling of superiority. This in comparison to depression is much more prevalent and is common in a 95% of existing in a person on at least one point in time. Similarly it is shown that 75% of the world’s population contains this feeling of superiority throughout the course of the individual’s life. This condition is caused when a person sees doors always opening before them. This condition exploded with the invention of the automatic sliding door. There is an easy way to tell who is suffering symptoms of this condition, they are often heard saying or they think often about the saying “when one door closes two more open.” The highest concentration of this physiological disorder is found in guidance councilors where 99%are proven cases for being a host of this condition. They are also the central location for infection into others since this disorder can be spread to others. Once it starts to spread to new people it usually spreads rather quickly possibly dying out in a few cases however most of the time it continues spreading living strong in its new hosts. With such a rapid contamination of this problem it is clear that we have an epidemic of a global scale on our hands yet not a word of warning or cure is given to the public. This shows the true danger to the mental well being of civilization.

Given the lack of warning to such a dangerous force I view it is my duty to give what information I have to help eradicate the problem. The best solution for everyone is to outlaw the use of doors all across the globe. I am aware this idealistic solution will never be possible due to the addiction of many people with power. They rely on doors to such an extent to allow them to discuss things behind them when they are closed. Therefore it is up to the individual efforts of a mob of people to change the culture of door reliance. Step one: If you have the authority or permission to do so remove all doors from your residence, place of work, and any other location where you frequently go. Step two: reduce your usage of doors. Never exceed the use of 5 doors within any given hour time span. It is also recommended each door usage should be at least 10 minutes if not more apart from each other. If it is an emergency it is allowable to use 2 doors within 10 minutes, however if you do so it is then recommended to follow this formula for the amount of time before your next usage. NT = ((2t)^2 )/3 where NT is the number of minutes you must wait until the next door incident and t is the amount of time between the initial 2 door usages within 10 minutes of each other. This formula is for the general public however this formula is not proven for everybody, and as such there is a more refined addition equation which will work for everybody which is the following (NT*Age)/5 Minutes if you are over the age of 5, and just (NT*Age) if you are under the age of 5. This amount of time is proven to allow the body and mind to recuperate enough from the trauma of the quick succession of door usage to endure another standard door use. The sooner you can fully adopt this system the better off you will be. From the calculations studied about door usage, depending on your age and factoring in the average door usage the number of days from this publication date that you have to adopt the plan is |((50-age)/2)| days. This number however is only for the readers who are under the age of 50, for those who are 50 or over you need to adopt this policy while reading this article to best secure your health and recovery from the damage doors have done to your body. If everybody isn’t able to adopt this plan before their time limit is up they may suffer brain function loss, slight memory alterations, decrease in life expectancy, and increase in infant mortality rate.

Please heed the warning I have offered you, always be on the look out for the doors to pop up when you least expect them as well as when you are expecting them. They will multiply and take over if we do not work as one and as individuals to counteract their dominion over us.

Run that by me one more time...

Describing such events as to which it will not have or will have already contained a participatory factor without knowing full well that the co-existing internal forces, which connotate the context of which will latter be explained, from which it will now and onward stand to exist.

Then therein is the limiting factor for which when one is willing to admit to the outright statement of the mass prolific nature of that which isn't necessarily defined, yet known by the acquiring of the forces for which it is known. For when the known is known by which it is known, the force for which it was known by is then considered the linking factor of the source of the admittance of the process.

The process on which understanding is built upon, unto the action in question, that is to assume that which it is said is indeed an action of which to speak, is the basic unit of which the connotation ensues which will be needed by the ones for which the understanding of which is stated by it which orates the ideals of things which have come to pass. If in fact the questionable material is neither action nor could be orally conditioned in of the actualization of the source from which all stemming matters arise from the centralized being of it which contains the capacity then forth with a new form from which new processes should be created from a location and source which cannot be interpreted in such a time as it doesn't exist in a state from which the creation of else-worthy causes are conceptualized.

Clarification as to what therein would be classified as action thus is to be of or within the surrounding nature of the fact of which is done with, regarding, or in otherwise close proximity to within reason of the general purpose of doing, seeing, hearing, feeling, as in all general terms sensing, as well as segmented forms of cranial activities of the one, and participants of which the one is associated.

Upon the phenomenon of such an occurrence of stipulations, key factors of which are necessary for the completion of such a process as to accomplish the seeking result from which source it comes leads through to a plethora of possibilities but which will only come to pass as a single potential based on the many internalized separators of which the source is derived from. True authentic version of control of such phenomenon is a rare enticement as the mass usually comes to the over-generalization of the said situation based on questionably existential commonalities between the mass and the source, thereby diminishing any authenticity of the value of such things as an authentic representation, or recreation of such an action.

The expression of such exacting times, or lack there of do not diminish the resulting factors stated earlier, it just stands to be mentioned as to the fact that many of these factors do not in and of themselves exist which brings about the whole debacle over whether the existence is in fact a factor but which is of course assumed to be of an existential state otherwise there would little consequence as to the result of needing to even participate in such processes or of reference to any one of many potential sources. As if there is no existence of the fact then there would be little to no necessity for either the source or the mass in of which is existent by the form of which the purpose the mass forms with the source to what is needed in the process which is as such known to exist thus by countering the reasons upon the qualm possessed within the one of which is comprehending the immense possibilities of potential the source, phenomenon, and all resulting actions therein which are resultants of such predetermined state of which there is need to fulfill.

Such imagined factors which supplement the lack of the ones which are unique in the sense of being the real factor forces thus the progression of the resulting states to be internalized throughout those of which were sharing only a participatory linkage to the fact through such things as one or many sources from the time on which the process has started.

Dramatization thus begins its course upon which is now in danger of lack of control from which the new knowledge of processes is too much for which to contain and being so must be expressed thoroughly through becoming such as the source and starting a process of sorts which differ from it being the source by several distinguishing factors. Firstly the processes in which these pseudo-sources contain the extraction of results entails solely to and with great confidence in such things as actualization of which process it has participated through recently will be resolved through counter process logical understanding of the occurrence through which it is accustomed. Secondly the source of which started the process will in thus to continue its own functional process the proper step which should follow if upon the process has succeeded in such to a point as to needing the accommodation of response through multiple forms of input including but not limited to the form of oratory converse which upon the process was formed, as including signaling of which form is chosen by such things as time-space allotment, estimated level of which the source is in mental understanding of such that the signals would be interpreted in a manner befitting the signal.

Upon meeting such requirements as to continue the process it is noted that such continuation of the process may not in fact be part of the process at all but instead become the beginning of such things as new process, or termination of such processes including the existence of the source and all which it has come to experience through such an internal dilemma of activity. However upon seeing such sentiments it stands that such ending mustn't be such a permanent process inevitability as to eliminate such as the source which is the form of holding to the internal force which is known to exist in the form of existences. upon such as the source existence is of it is none then such things as the force which housed within the source is then upon the consequences necessarily needed to transfer in location in essence generating a new source from which a process is needed to upon the above stated is recycled to which time is no factor in that of which is repeated to preserve the state of existence known to be true.

Upon actualization of continuing of the process it is then noted that the above does not take place at such a time limiting the factor of which time is cyclitive and repeats upon itself lacking in control in such that such event should and most probably would happen excluding such factors of that which is unknown as of the source to exist in a state that of which the force is, becoming at such time that the above statements should never come to pass in essence containing in with itself such that the opening stands true in that existence is to be true. Until such a time as such occurrences are essentially commonplace such things as the process in a whole would in effect change in total preventing from the preceding from standing upon the truth from which it stands while still maintaining that which should always be in existence. When such process is no longer in such a state as being valid, existence of such as a process of new processes become available and as such the process is reformed through itself upon itself generating the existence of new states of the process on which the source is necessary to perform in that or upon enacting the above in the continuation of the existence through transference through such actions as that of to support the process.

Upon the saturation point of the source as to receive input into the form of the various forms stated above it is needed that as such there be such time as to process and calculate the link to process stage which is needed for such verification be processed to which the one not in connection to the source becomes aware as to the understanding of such topics as was signaled. Such an understanding can thus be followed by actions as stated in what stands as action above in that the actions can repeat and form new cycles upon themselves until at which point the ones not as is in the source of the action becomes dissatisfied with such processes and in effect terminates continuations of which the process is designed, thus forcing such actions upon the source to find such things as those which have not yet participated, or haven't participated in such as the process in an adequate period of time in to which acceptance of such as the process is acceptable.

As to how much cycling is needed depends upon the participated internal which doesn't exist as to only the internal force in the source exists as to which the participated must therefore entice and enforce load-outs of the source and thereby forcing the internal force unto itself at which time becoming such as the existing source. Upon this act such and all subsequent source formations follow patterns of processes not specified to anything other than which is upon the source internal force itself, any process in which followed from that of the force in which it was created and formed around.

Upon such actions as the stated means little to the existence of the existence since in that the process and force in discussion is thus the action depending upon that of which the source chooses though many inevitably foresee the fate of which the process ends to effect as to build an existence around showing the existence and to a form of such that helping form the existence of other sources even if such as that such are only fake non-existences in which there is little to no reason to spend the time-frame dealing with.



Digest such statements above and contemplate such things as to whether understanding as to the process the force and to the general idea withheld thoroughly through which is discussed in length above.

Q?

Quietly quarantined, Quebec-en Queen's quiffs quiver qualified quarter quasi-quintessence.
Quotable quasars quadruply questions quail quill quiver quality, queuing quilting queries.
Quantitative quips quaintly quelling quiz quota qualms, quickly quench quagga quaere.
Quashing quartz quiescently quakes quickwitted quintet's quality qualitatively quitting.

But...

I am here, but the state isn't static.
I am everywhere, but no place in particular.
I am seen by all, but remembered by none.
I am conversed with by many, but understood by few.
I am conscious of everything, but make aware of it seldom.
I am what time forgot, but it won't forget forever.
I am one of few, but I got lonely so I left.
I am lacking something, but who will spot it.
I am the emotion, but for what does it bring.
I am thought of, but in what light.
I am the line, but white space precedes me.
I am that guy over there, but what was his name again.
I am not the same as them, but then how is the void filled.
I am quiet, but can the sounds of my thoughts be heard.
I am patient, but the virtue has overstayed its welcome.
I am a container, but lack the conventions that make me... me.
I am in flux, but this is not one of those times.
I am the source, but the cost is severe.

I am... but am I not?

Words to Waste your Time over

Just for a moment, take a side step, and contemplate with me.

Domvr yo,r od sm o;;idopm. jpe fp er lmpe ejpdr od ,pdy svvitsyr/
Sd divj. dsuomh pmrdr;g epi;f nr s drmdon;r yjomh gpt s trsdpmsn;r [rtdpm yp vp,r yp sd s vpmv;idopm/
Jperbrt eoyj s;; yjr yo,r ;pdy om [tpgpimf yjpihj pbrt yjr ,pdy im=[tpgpimf yjomhd. ,u drmdr pg yo,r ,idy nr rcsd[rtsyrf;u d;pe ejrm vp,[strf yp yjr mrcy/

Eoyj yjsy dsof ,smu ,su wirdyopm. eju yjrm epi;f upi mpy dyp[ ejo;r upit nrjomf. smf trhsom upit pem yo,r;omrdd nu kpomomh pm yjr o;;idopmstu mpt,/

Yjr pm;u trd[pmdr/// eju. og upi ,idy wirdyopm str upi yjrm yjomlomh om divj yrt,d/// mpe [iyyomh upitdr;g om ejovj upi. upitdr;g wirdyopm yjr eptyj/

O o,[;ptr upi omdyrsf yp rcs,omr yjr gsvsfr om ejovj upi str om' drr og oy od yjr yo,r om ejovj upi [iy upitdr;g/


Smf sy yjr vpmv;idopm pg ,i;;omh yjsy pbrt gpt s ejo;r. O vpmhtyfi;syr upi pm dyr[[omh fpem s ;rbr; gtp, upit [rfrdys;d smf drromh s;;. sd od mpy ,rsmy yp nr drrm.
yo,r [rt,oyyomh/

Monkey... Myth, Mystery, Mathematical Impossibility?

Evolutionarily
Challenged


Are they?... Are they really?... It is hard to tell honestly when you could use the term for so many species that you would think they might want their own term to diversify themselves from other species which they themselves view as lesser beings.

Yet who am I to say what a monkey would really want to be referred to as, for to truly know, one must fully immerse oneself within the cultural happenings of the monkey populace.

I have not yet done such a thing so therefore I (strictly speaking on my own experience) would not know the proper term that they would want to be called. We could ask Jane Goodall... however she spent her time with the chimpanzees, and as everyone knows the true monkeys with the know-how are the ones with tails.

Furthermore to look at the term "Evolutionarily challenged" closer who are we to say that the monkey is a lesser evolved creature as in for, they have a tail.

We (for the most part) do not no tails. Having a tail such activities as cosplay of many individuals would be so much easier... some of them would include Goku, Gohan, Vegeta, Vegeta’s partner in crime (who said "Vegeta what does his power level read") and if you want to get technical the whole saiyan race you could successfully cosplay as. With tails we would also be able to accomplish a conga line how it is supposed to be done.

We do however have a tailbone (which you can break if you fall on your butt hard enough) but we have no tail to speak of… I would argue that we are the ones evolutionary challenged, and from this and the interpretations from myself as a source knowledge which I have interpreted we are being ruled by the monkeys.


Supreme OVERLORD monkey


With such prominent figureheads today, and the recent past it is amazing that more haven’t realized the surprising fact that we are ruled by the monkey. Some examples to spark your memory are Donkey Kong, King Louie, King Kong, Amy (From Congo), The Planet of the Apes, The Monkees (which is a double reference from music and tv), Gorillaz…etc…etc. Each and every one of these references was a major role in their own stardom… even though these aren’t all monkeys, and some reference apes (different than monkeys) there is sure enough a monkey running the show in the background.. Many times the monkeys will not show themselves in their own form of ruling over us, but occasionally you get a glimpse of it such as the monkey ruling at the Donkey Kong era placed himself in the latter recreations in the form of a sidekick (which we all know to be true that was ruling the game).

It is also only right that we mostly reference the ape which is closer to ourselves (lacking tails) however the ape is still an offshoot of the overlord monkey (the one with the tail). It is also key to know it is not known, nor has it ever been known which specific monkey is the ones which hold overlord status. Thus we must think of any type of monkey (with a tail of course) when thinking of the overlord monkey.

There-in-fore to refer to the monkey as a lesser being than ourselves is in fact a train of thought derived from mistranslated elder knowledge. When in fact we are being ruled over similarly to how we rule the cow… Many civilizations worshiped the monkey and they were closer to seeing how things actually work in the world than many other people.

If I may use a reference to help further imprint the message…

Without the monkey’s wisdom and ruling guidance we would all be just like the magikarp splashing around just waiting to be eaten by something. Through the monkey we have gained the ability to tackle (if I may continue my reference) and now we are “ruling” (as we are blinded by our ability to see that the tail bearers influence).

Anyway back to the topic at hand not getting sidetracked by a references when many lack the willingness to understand the basic origins of, the.

If none remember… we are bound to do something to instigate the frenzied wrath of the monkey… upon our misshapen form.






I now return you to your regularly scheduled brain waves.